Supreme Court’s Justice Vikram Nath asserted AI can aid judicial processes but won’t replace judges’ core judgment-writing role. He highlighted AI’s limitations in complex cases like matrimonial disputes and constitutional matters. Other judges echoed concerns about AI’s potential for bias and the need for human conscience in justice delivery, emphasizing its role as a facilitator, not a substitute.

Read original article

Leave a Comment

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *